Overall, the review did not find that intermittent fasting had a low dropout rate, and therefore was not necessarily easier to follow than other weight loss approaches. When comparing dropout rates between the fasting groups and continuous calorie restriction groups, no significant differences were found. Half of the studies were controlled trials comparing the fasting group to a comparison group and/or a control group (either continuous calorie restriction or usual lifestyle), with the other half examining an intermittent fasting group alone. It is important to note that different study designs and methods of intermittent fasting were used, and participant characteristics differed (lean vs. There was much variability in the studies, ranging in size from 4 to 334 subjects, and followed from 2 to 104 weeks. Ī systematic review of 40 studies found that intermittent fasting was effective for weight loss, with a typical loss of 7-11 pounds over 10 weeks. However, studies have not shown this to be true when compared with other weight loss methods. An understandable concern of this diet is that followers will overeat on non-fasting days to compensate for calories lost during fasting. Proponents of the diet believe that the stress of intermittent fasting causes an immune response that repairs cells and produces positive metabolic changes (reduction in triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, weight, fat mass, blood glucose). Although the evidence for caloric restriction in animal studies is strong, there is less convincing evidence in human studies. Physiologically, calorie restriction has been shown in animals to increase lifespan and improve tolerance to various metabolic stresses in the body. Example: Meals are eaten from 8am-3pm, with fasting during the remaining hours of the day.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |